NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2 Applying an EBP Model

NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2 Applying an EBP Model

Student Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX4025 Research and Evidence-Based Decision Making

Professor’s Name

Submission Date

×
Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
Enter correct details to download the content








    Applying an EBP Model

    Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary blood disorder that causes the red blood cells to stiffen into a sickle shape. This leads to obstruction in the blood vessels, pain crisis, organ damage, and a drop in the quality of life (QOL) (D’Costa et al., 2023). Children such as a 10-year-old with a pain crisis require holistic and lifetime care. Evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing is an effort to improve patient safety and care. This takes into account evidence, practitioner and patient values/preferences in order to realize the intended results. The paper discusses the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model to resolve problems in the SCD child’s care and enhance his pain control experience.

    Description of the Diagnosis and Associated Issue

    Sickle cell anemia is a long-lasting condition that is commonly experienced by children. Pain (pain crises) has been noted to be a common symptom of the disease in childhood, with multiple hospital visits and requiring a multidisciplinary team for their management (Jain et al., 2026). A problem with SCD is that there is a gap between the development of the disease and symptoms and complications (pain crisis). In addition, care can be influenced by problems with the coordination of services and access to health services, including transportation problems, lack of knowledge and skills in health care providers. These affect the quality of life and complications.

    It is here that an EBP approach can assist, where care can be provided in a different way compared to the typical care approach and not based on the best available evidence. Without the availability and consistency of using evidence-based approaches, there’s a potential for a delay in timely pain and supportive care interventions. The EBP model assists health care practitioners in planning care, avoiding delays in care, and enhancing quality and outcomes with the top and current evidence at their fingertips (Connor, 2023). This means that an EBP model will need to be adopted to aid in alleviating these problems and health outcomes in children with SCD.

    Selection of the Evidence-Based Practice Model

    The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) model was chosen for this discussion as it is an easy way to integrate and use to support decision-making (Bissett et al., 2025). This model is divided into three general steps: Practice Question (P), Evidence (E), and Translation (T). The model provides a framework that nurses can use to recognize evidence problems, seek evidence, and transform practice to utilize evidence.

    The JHNEBP model is suitable to tackle issues related to sickle cell disease as it is practice-focused. It assists nurses in forming practice questions and finding and utilizing evidence. It also results in better patient outcomes and the added advantages of standardisation and uniformity of nursing care (Gaber et al., 2025). The simplicity of the models enables them to be used in complicated issues, including delays in the treatment and care of SCD kids.

    Description of the Evidence-Based Practice Model Steps

    The JHNEBP model’s first step is the Practice Question (P), and it starts with recognising a problem and developing an evidence question. This may be achieved by taking into account Population (P), Intervention (I), Comparison (C), Outcome (O), and Time (T) factors (PICOT). Again, with regard to sickle cell disease, the practice question is to coordinate care and expedite treatment for pain in children.

    The second step is Evidence (E), as nurses apply evidence by searching for studies and analysing the validity and applicability of the studies. The nurses search credible databases (for example, PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) for peer-reviewed evidence in the area. And the nurses also critique the evidence for validity, reliability, and strength to ensure that the evidence used to guide our practice is reliable.

    The third step is Transformation (T), or putting the evidence into our practice. This is when we introduce strategies to facilitate change, such as improved communication between health care providers, education of the patient, and removing these barriers to treatment (Ainslie et al., 2024). These strategies are tested to assess the impact it has on the patient. Steps are important as they outline the strategic approach of the model by using best practices in health care.

    Application of the Evidence-Based Practice Model to the Issue

    A particular issue impacted by using the JHNEBP model was the delayed treatment and lack of coordination of care in the case of childhood sickle cell disease. In the Practice Question phase, a PICOT question was developed: What is the effect of enhanced care on the prevention and treatment of pain crises, and on patient outcomes in kids who suffer from sickle cell disease compared to usual care? This question was applied in searching for literature.

    In the Evidence phase, peer-reviewed literature from the past 5 years was identified using search engines PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. We conducted a search based on the following terms: Sickle cell disease, children, childhood, pain crisis, coordination of care, and barriers to care. Articles we have chosen were based on the research findings within the past few years, with results in children and barriers to care. We identified barriers to care, with few studies focused on children, and problems getting the full text of certain studies. We had the opportunity to search a couple of studies.

    At the Translation stage, we formulated care improvement strategies based on the data in the research. These strategies involve communication with the health care team and families, support services like transport services, and protocol use to manage pain (Baker et al., 2024). The goals of these strategies are to reduce delays in care as well as enhance treatment.

    Analysis of Evidence

    The first one – Schlenz et al. (2025) – is a qualitative study that explains the impediments and enablers of care in children with sickle cell disease. The research is credible, since it appears in a peer-reviewed journal and it was funded by the National Institutes of Health, which provided them with a certain assurance of conducting research. It can also be applied since it is directly related to some of the challenges that children with SCD face, like delays in care, access to care, and other care issues. Being qualitative in nature, it’s much more insightful as to the patient and family experience and should be thought about in terms of operational challenges.

    Schieve et al. (2022) may be regarded as a quantitative research study since this study will focus on the role of applying recommended care measures in preventing complications in children with SCD. In my opinion, the study is a very good one as it is published in a highly-rated journal and has considered a vast amount of data sets. This is significant as it provides us with information on the effectiveness of preventive practise. It is more a quantitative, not a qualitative study, and thus suited to evidence-based practice better.

    The third article is on the topic of care management, and the community nurse who has a patient with a chronic condition (Ge et al. 2023). It was a valid study as it was peer-reviewed and by expert authors. This can be applied to care management in SCD, as it talks about the significance of communication and support for caring for a person with a chronic illness. This study offers pragmatic knowledge of the effect of nursing interventions on care, compared to other resources.

    All three studies are valid in general, though the quantitative study is more valid than the other two since it has a large sample and statistical analysis of the data. But the qualitative study (Schlenz et al. 2025) provides the much-needed context and insight into patients’ views and is essential for patient-centered care.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, sickle cell disease poses a challenge to pediatric health care, such as pain and transitions of care. The involvement and engagement of nurses in a process is enhanced by the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model. It has evidence, exploration, and implementation in decision-making. This is through the provision of care problem solutions and the implementation of 5 care strategies. Thus, the optimal and patient-centered care heavily depends on EBP.

    Step-By-Step Instructions to write
    NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2

    ×
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
    Enter correct details to download the content








      Contact us today and receive expert step-by-step instructions for NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2.

      References for
      NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2

      ×
      Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
      Enter correct details to download the content








        Ainslie, M., Collins, A. F., Hebert, D., Moore, J., Schriefer, S. P., & Margaret Hadro Venzke. (2024). Overcoming barriers to healthcare reform: A call to action. Policy Politics & Nursing Practice25(4), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544241268411

        Baker, M. B., Liu, E. C., Bully, M. A., Hsieh, A., Nozari, A., Tuler, M., & Binda, D. D. (2024). Overcoming barriers: A comprehensive review of chronic pain management and accessibility challenges in rural America. Healthcare12(17), 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171765

        Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2025). A guided introduction to the fifth edition of the Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice model. AJN, American Journal of Nursing125(11), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajn.0000000000000174

        Connor, L. (2023). Evidence‐Based practice improves patient outcomes and healthcare system return on investment: Findings from a scoping review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing20(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12621

        D’Costa, C., Sharma, O., Manna, R., Singh, M., Singh, S., Singh, S., Anish Mahto, Govil, P., Satti, S., Ninad Mehendale, Italia, Y., & Paul, D. (2023). Differential sensitivity to hypoxia enables shape‐based classification of sickle cell disease and trait blood samples at the point of care. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine9(4), e10643. https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10643

        Gaber, F., Shaik, M., Allega, F., Bilecz, A. J., Busch, F., Goon, K., Franke, V., & Altuna Akalin. (2025). Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support for triage, referral, and diagnosis. Npj Digital Medicine8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01684-1

        Ge, J., Zhang, Y., Fan, E., Yang, X., Chu, L., Zhou, X., Yan, Y., & Liu, W. (2023). Community nurses are important providers of continuity of care for patients with chronic diseases: A qualitative study. Inquiry60(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580231160888

        Jain, A., Roberts, L., & Sahin, S. (2026). Global burden of sickle cell disease: Adequacy of pain control as evidenced by frequency of oral pain medication use, health outcomes, and emotional well‐being across diverse populations. EJHaem7(2), e70199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.70199

        Schieve, L. A., Simmons, G. M., Payne, A. B., Abe, K., Hsu, L. L., Hulihan, M., Pope, S., Rhie, S., Dupervil, B., & Hooper, W. C. (2022). Vital signs: Use of recommended health care measures to prevent selected complications of sickle cell anemia in children and adolescents — selected U.S. states, 2019. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report71(39), 1241–1246. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7139e1

        Schlenz, A. M., Vestal, E., Abrams, C. M., Kanter, J., & Phillips, S. (2025). Barriers and facilitators to comprehensive pediatric sickle cell care: A qualitative study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer72(5), e31603. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31603

        Best Capella Professor to choose for
        NURS-FPX4025 Class

        ×
        Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
        Enter correct details to download the content








          • Lisa Kreeger, PhD, RN.
          • Buddy Wiltcher, EdD, MSN, APRN, FNP-C.

          (FAQ's) related to
          NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2

          ×
          Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
          Enter correct details to download the content








            Question 1: What is NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2 about?

            Answer 1: Applying the Johns Hopkins EBP model to pediatric sickle cell disease care.

            Question 2: Where can I get expert help with NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2?

            Answer 2: Get expert help with NURS FPX 4025 Assessment 2 from experienced and verified tutors at nursfpx4045assessment.com.

            Do you need a tutor to help with this paper for you within 24 hours

            • 0% Plagiarised
            • 0% AI
            • 24 hour delivery
            • Distinguish grades guarantee









              Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

                Please enter your email to receive instant access to the sample.







                Verification is necessary to avoid bots
                Scroll to Top